Katherine Howard- Some Misconceptions

On 13 February 1542, Katherine Howard, the fifth wife of Henry VIII, was beheaded in the grounds of the Tower of London. An Act of Attainder had been passed, convicting her of adultery and treason, without the formality of a trial. However, many of the well-known facts about Katherine are wrong.

Katherine Howard miniature

Miniature identified as Katherine Howard

A Frivolous Teenager

Well, probably not. We don’t know Katherine’s date of birth but scholars are increasingly in favour of an earlier date than was previously thought. Until recently, her year of birth was thought to be as late as 1525, making her only 17 years old at her execution. It seems more likely that it was 1520-1. This would mean that she was a mature, by Tudor standards, 21-22 years old at her death.

Of course, even 22 is horribly young to die, but in the sixteenth century, 22 was a lot more mature than it is now. By her early twenties, a Tudor woman could expect to be married and have had one or more children. Katherine’s youth is put more sharply into context by the relative age of her husband- Henry was 49 years old when they married. This too, though, was not unusual. Noblewomen in particular were likely to marry an older man. A woman would marry for the first time in her mid- to late teens, a man in his late twenties or early thirties. If it was the man’s second marriage, he would be older still. For example, Catherine Parr’s second marriage took place when she was 20 and her husband 40.

No Better Than She Ought To Be

Katherine Howard’s reputation suffers from a rather unjust assessment of her character. We are encouraged to believe that she was involved in a sexual relationship with Thomas Culpeper during her marriage because she admitted to a sexual relationship with Francis Dereham prior to it. Katherine’s past was laid out for all to see in a way which would make horrible modern gossip magazines rub their hands with glee. What is revealed is an unsupervised childhood during which she was involved in a relationship with her music tutor. It was the sort of “relationship” we would now call child abuse. She then became involved with Francis Dereham, a young man with far better breeding and prospects than her creepy music teacher. It is likely that she and Dereham intended to marry and this might indeed have come to pass had not the king shown an interest in her.

Katherine’s letter to Culpeper shows that she was indeed in love with him in 1541 but David Starkey’s research in his 2004 Six Wives: The Queens of Henry VIII demonstrates that the physicality of their relationship was far less certain. It appears from the detail of her confession that all the couple got up to was some hand-holding and earnest sighing.

This fact- the fact of Katherine Howard’s essential innocence- is often overlooked. She oddly, naïvely, believed that her husband was some sort of semi-divine being and she cautioned Culpeper not to speak of their relationship even in the confessional lest Henry find out that way. It may have been that she suspected the priest would inform Henry, but she may had simply believed that as Supreme Head of the Church, Henry would know the way that God knew.

Katherine Howard to Thomas Culpepper, 1541

Manuscript of Katherine Howard’s letter to Thomas Culpeper, 1541

“I die a Queen, but I would rather die the wife of Culpeper.”

There is a romantic story that on the scaffold, Katherine announced that she would have been married to her supposed lover, Thomas Culpeper, than Henry, with the above words. However, the etiquette of execution made such a statement unthinkable. The victim was permitted to address the crowd gathered to see their end, but it was expected that they would speak of their regret, ask for forgiveness and the prayers of those who would survive them and generally be contrite and uncontroversial. Neither Anne Boleyn nor any of the men executed for adultery with her protested their innocence from the scaffold, although they were all almost certainly innocent. It just wasn’t done.

It’s therefore unthinkable that Katherine Howard would say such a thing. Her actual words are far more dignified than the romantic nonsense would give her credit for. This is a woman who was so keen to meet her maker with some grace that she asked for the executioner’s block to be brought to her room the night before so that she could practice placing her head on it.

The Afterlife of Katherine Howard

Visitors to the splendid Hampton Court Palace are often treated to the tale of poor Katherine’s ghost. It is said to linger in the Haunted Gallery. On her arrest, Katherine broke free from her guards and ran down the gallery looking for her husband in order to plead for her life. She was quickly recaptured by the guards and dragged screaming back down the gallery and into imprisonment. Or so the story goes.

Aside from the supernatural question, there are several holes in this story. Firstly, is it plausible that Katherine could have slipped her guards, even for a moment? She was a young woman held by one or two strong men. Royal guards were not in the habit of relaxing their grip on accused traitors. The story also ignores one rather pertinent fact: by the time of her arrest, Henry had already left Hampton Court. He was not in the habit of lingering once he had put his plan to be rid of a wife into action. Anne Boleyn, for example, never set eyes on Henry after the May Day joust, the day before her arrest. He was said to be so bitterly disappointed in Katherine that he could not stand to see her again and he fled the palace so as to avoid her.

17 thoughts on “Katherine Howard- Some Misconceptions

    1. Gillian Post author

      Hi Sam. Thanks so much- really glad you enjoyed it. I always have a bit of a bee in my bonnet about how Katherine Howard is so quickly dismissed as bit of a bimbo who just liked boys and jewellery. I’m hoping this can correct that image a little bit.

  1. Pingback: History Carnival #107 – March 2012 « The View East

  2. Ashlie Jensen

    A well needed article to debunk some of the myths that surround Katherine Howard! Nicely done; I shall re-tweet this to my followers since I think it is important that people read this. And although I think we can agree that Katherine Howard was foolish in many ways, she certainly did not have a happy childhood or good people around her to guide her in such a treacherous world.
    And you absolutely hit the nail on the head in saying that Henry Mannox’s relationship with Katherine Howard would today be considered child abuse. Everything I have read suggests that this was a predatory relationship in which the young Katherine Howard was taken advantage of emotionally and sexually.

    Again, excellent job! I am really enjoying your site. And really, I have yet to come across a blog with a name more clever than yours! 😉


    Ashlie Jensen of “BeingBess”
    Being Bess is dedicated to celebrating the life of Elizabeth Tudor (1533-1603) and the legacy of her reign as Queen of England (1558-1603).

    1. Gillian Post author

      Hi Ashlie,

      Sorry for the delayed response. Thanks so much. I’m glad you enjoyed the post and the site.

      I’m a big fan of Elizabeth I too.


  3. History Press

    “Katherine’s reputation suffers from a rather unjust assessment of her character.”

    Agreed. Thank you for a fascinating and informative post, and for sparking a deeper discussion of such an infamous character in history.

  4. Dee

    Excellent article! I’m a bit of a history buff myself and a feminist too. The mixture of the two in your blogs is brilliant, I’m going to read them all! Keep it coming Gillian!

  5. Pam

    An absolutely brilliant read. I’m a history buff and am especially interested in the six wives of Henry VIII, and the Tudors. I think it’s unfortunate that Katherine is portrayed in such a way when so little is known of her. I wish that more historians would consider the points you’ve raised, instead of perpetuating the image poor Katherine was left with. Keep up the good work 🙂

    1. Gillian Post author

      Thank you so much! I’m really glad you enjoyed it. I think that Katherine, of all Henry’s wives, is the most unjustly treated. There are re-appraisals and re-re-appraisals of the others but for some reason, everyone seems to just accept the Victorian picture of Katherine.

  6. Kevin

    The Tudors fic/doc prompted me to find out more about Anne of Cleves and Catherine Howard Henry said she (Anne) looked like a horse (was that statement true?). In the series Henry was a strapping 40ish in reality he was closer or past 50 and grossly obese. I dont know why these producers intentionally try and recreate history on the small screen. People end up believing it. At Least I know a little more about these two women as a result.

  7. Pingback: Anne of Cleves reassessment

  8. Conor Byrne

    Interesting article. I, too, have recently written an article on misconceptions surrounding Katherine, which can be accessed at my blog.

    I do have to disagree with you, however, regarding Katherine’s age. For me, there is no evidence whatsoever to support a 1520-1 birth. I think she probably was seventeen or eighteen at her execution.

  9. Pingback: A execução de Catarina Howard | Boullan

  10. Pingback: Tudors Truths Distorted: Common Misconceptions - Henry VIII & The Tudors

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.